Special
Assignment: Amtrak
November 16, 2001
by John Bloom
ABOARD THE TEXAS EAGLE (UPI) -- Somewhere between Cleburne
and McGregor, Texas, not far from President Bush's ranch, I lurch
through the observation car--the train runs at top speed through
these flat treeless prairies--and find an empty table in the
dining room.
But as I'm ordering the T-bone--which is, by the way, always
outstanding on the Texas Eagle--a moon-faced guy in glasses plops
down opposite me.
"Want some company?" he says with a surreal grin.
I smile and give a slight nod, and he launches into
disjointed small talk about the evening--it's dusk and the stars
are just coming out--and after a while he says, "So where are you
from?"
I tell him.
"Oh really? I thought you were from a foreign country."
"No."
I study his face. He has a forced pleasantness, an
artificial eager-to-please tone. Where have I seen this before?
Ljubljana comes to mind. The capital of Slovenia. When it
was part of Communist Yugoslavia, round-faced men would approach
you in hotels there, pretending to be American tourists, but
their thick Slavic accents made their performance ludicrous. They
wanted to know who you were, what you were doing in Yugoslavia.
They would find out if you were trading money on the black market
and then suddenly disappear.
And that's just what happens with this guy. After two or
three painful minutes, he abruptly jumps up from the table and
walks back through the galley to the other end of the dining car.
He joins another table and studiously avoids my gaze.
I suppose I've passed the Terrorist-on-the-Texas-Eagle test.
Terrorists ordering T-bones on Amtrak is actually not quite
so far-fetched as it sounds, since two suspected terrorists
actually did take the Texas Eagle on September 11th. Their
Newark-to-San Antonio flight had been diverted to St. Louis and
grounded. So that same evening they bought tickets on the Texas
Eagle, which pulls into St. Louis around 11 p.m. and arrives in
San Antonio 24 hours later.
But they never made it as far as the treeless prairie
between Cleburne and McGregor. Responding to reports of
"suspicious behavior," the FBI pulled the two Arab men off the
train the next afternoon in Fort Worth and spirited them back to
New Jersey, where they've been detained ever since. So I suppose
there's some precedent for undercover terrorism inquiries on the
Eagle.
They couldn't have chosen a worse means of transportation,
though, because only a foreigner would think he could be
inconspicuous on Amtrak. The American long-distance railroad--
suddenly popular again in these times of flight fears--has to be
one of the most social forms of travel since the stagecoach. It's
impossible to spend that much time on a train and not eventually
come into contact with virtually all the other passengers, even
if it's only to brush past their seats on your way to the smoking
lounge or the bar.
I've met a Mexican congressman on the train, a Canadian elk-
hunting guide, and two students from the Sorbonne, but as I think
back over my thousands of railroad hours logged, that's about it
for the "international traveller" category. Amtrak is so all-
American that regulars on the Crescent--the express between New
York and New Orleans--get upset if the chef runs out of grits. On
the Coast Starlight, which runs along the Pacific between Los
Angeles and Seattle, they've been known to put folk singers in
the parlor car, and we all know that no international traveller
would sit still for that. Not to mention that drawling cowboy who
climbs aboard the Sunset Limited in Del Rio, Texas, and describes
every stand of sagebrush and ocotillo all the way to Alpine.
The last two months have been great for Amtrak in terms of
first-time train travellers, but most of them don't quite have
the hang of it yet. They haven't mastered the Aisle Duckwalk that
keeps them upright and out of a stranger's lap as they travel
from one car to the next. They order the White Castle hamburgers
in the lounge car, which are notorious for being soggy, tasteless
and hard on the tummy. They say, "Why are we sitting here while
these freight trains go ahead of us?" (Freight trains always go
ahead of Amtrak.) They expect the 8 o'clock movie to be decent,
when we all know it's going to be "Legally Blonde"--again. One
particularly amusing fellow on the Metroliner between New York
and Washington kept marvelling that there were no seat belts. And
first-timers almost always run afoul of the "no sock feet" policy
and have to be sternly admonished by the porter to put their
shoes back on when they're in the aisles.
The Amtrak crews, on the other hand, regard this time as a
chance to show what they can do. They've always had a love-hate
relationship with their jobs. They love the railroad, but they're
not too fond of the Washington bosses who seem to keep it forever
in thralldom. More than one Amtrak employee noted that, while
thousands of Americans were switching to rail travel and
Congressmen were taking the train, not planes, to visit Ground
Zero, the airlines were handed billions while Amtrak's much more
modest request for $500 million continued to languish in
committee.
Amtrak is the only national railroad in the world that is
expected to make money, and yet this strict bottom-line oversight
has resulted in the skimpiest long-distance network of any
civilized nation. Long-distance trains, especially in a country
that has really long distances, can't turn a profit after 40
years of constant route cutbacks that make reasonable connections
impossible. There are simply too many places that you can't get to
from here.
The California Zephyr, for example, is one of the most
popular long routes and definitely the most beautiful, running
from Chicago to San Francisco and crossing the Rockies in the
daytime in both directions. But most days it includes only three
or four sleeper cars and an equal number of coaches--even though
it's almost always sold out. To become economically sensible, it
would need two or three times the rolling stock--but how can
Amtrak invest in new cars that wouldn't be expected to pay for
themselves for five or ten more years? And how can you get more
people to ride it when all of its feeder connections--like the
famous Desert Wind, from Salt Lake to Los Angeles via Vegas--have
been eliminated?
I'm not going to rehash all the complicated arguments for
providing more subsidies to Amtrak, not less, so that we can
rebuild the passenger railroad system that was once the greatest
in the world and is now, at best, the 20th. But here are a few
points that aren't made often enough:
© Copyright 2001
United Press International and John Bloom